Significance of Glomerular PAS Positive Matrix Deposition in Glomerulonephritis

Significance of Glomerular PAS Positive Matrix Deposition in Glomerulonephritis

*Das RK,1 Kabir AN,2 Begum F,3 Khanam A,4 Kamal M5

Abstrat:

This study was done with the aim to calculate the glomerular PAS positive material quantitatively in glomerulonephritis and to find out its correlation with renal function. A total of 112 cases of glomerulonephritis were included in this study and morphometric measurements of the percentages of glomerular PAS positive areas were performed in a computer with a specially constructed grid. The mean of these values was scored from 1-4 according to the degree of PAS positive material deposition. With the increase of glomerular PAS positive score the levels of blood urea and serum creatinine also increased but the levels of creatinine clearance rate decreased. The percentages of glomerular PAS positive areas were correlated with renal functions expressed as levels of blood urea, serum creatinine and creatinine clearance rate. The degree of glomerular PAS positive matrix deposition showed strong positive correlation with levels of blood urea and serum creatinine (r=0.566, p<.0.001 and r=0.763, p=<0.001, respectively). Whereas creatinine clearance rate showed striking inverse relationship with PAS positive areas (r= – 0.612, p<0.001). Thus, the present study confirmed the previous results concerning a significant correlation between these parameters.

[Journal of Histopathology and Cytopathology, 2018 Jan; 2 (1):3-10]

Key words: Glomerulonephritis, PAS positive matrix, morphometry, renal function.

 

  1. *Dr. Ruhini Kumar Das, Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, M Abdur Rahim Medical College, Dinajpur. dr.ruhini@gmail.com
  2. AKM Nurul Kabir, Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka.
  3. Ferdousy Begum, Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka.
  4. Anisa Khanam, Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, United Hospital, Dhaka.
  5. Mohammed Kamal, Professor, Department of Pathology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka.

*For correspondence

Introduction
Chronic glomerulonephritis is one of the most important causes of chronic renal failure, which is the end result of a variety of human kidney diseases and is the major cause of death.1 It is clear that immune mechanism involved in most of the glomerulonephritis and initial target of injury is the glomerulus of kidney causing glomerular structural abnormalities. Other changes such as interstitial fibrosis, inflammatory infiltrate and tubular atrophy are secondary and nonspecific phenomenon, which are related to the degree of glomerular damage.2 Cell proliferation and deposition of different types of extracellular matrix components in the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) and/or in the mesangium characterizes the histology of glomerulus in glomerulonephritis.3 These changes in the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) and mesangiumare characterized by expansion of all the intrinsic extracellular matrix components due to increased production, decreased turnover or both of these components.4 Immunohistochemical techniques have demonstrated that glomerular extracellular matrix comprises laminin, fibronectin, entectin, heparansulfate, chondroitin sulfate, decorine and various types of collagen.2 Glomerular extracellular matriceses are PAS positive therefore the amount of  PAS positive material deposition can reflect the severity of glomerular injury and has been claimed important in  predicting renal function in glomerulonephritis.2 Series of histomormphometric studies established that the severity of renal failure in various types of glomerulopathy closely related with the severity of the tubulointerstitial changes, whereas the correlation with glomerular abnormalities is absent or weak.5-11 Critics of these studies were that the severity of interstitial abnormalities was evaluated by quantitative methods whereas the glomerular pathology was studied by semi-quantitative technique.2 Many investigators became puzzled by this apparent lack of correlation between glomerular abnormalities and renal failure although the glomerular pathology is the more important factor in glomerulonephritis and performed the quantitative study with particular interest to the deposition of glomerular PAS positive material. Some studies demonstrated that both glomerular and interstitial extracellular matrix accumulation contribute in impairment of kidney function. In the glomeruli PAS positive extracellular matrix deposition seems to be particularly important and correlate strongly with renal failure,2,4 whereas other failed to find such correlation.13 Therefore, the glomerular deposition of PAS positive matrix is reflected in renal failure has become a controvertial issue. This study was carried out with the aim to calculate the glomerular PAS positive material (% of total glomerular areas) by quantitative technique in glomerulonephritis and to find out its correlation with renal function to confirm this condrovertial issue.

 Methods

Patients
This study was carried out in the Department of Pathology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka. The renal tissues that were examined were collected for clinical purposes by percutaneous kidney biopsy by a surgical procedure. 112 patients of glomerulonephritis, where renal biopsy revealed variable degrees of increased mesangial cells, matrix, hyalinization and sclerosis were selected for this study. Renal tissues containing at least five glomeruli in haematoxylin & eosin stained sections were considered as adequate for evaluation. Blood urea, serum creatinine and creatinine clearance rate (Ccr) were done at the time of biopsy to assess the excretory function of kidney.

 Light Microscopy

Tissue for light microscopic examination was fixed in 10% formalin and processed routinely. Sections were cut 4-5 µm thickness from paraffin embedded material and stained by haematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid Schiff (PAS), Masson’s trichrome and methenamine silver (Jones) stains.

Immunofluorescence Microscopy

Renal biopsy specimens were embedded in O.C.T. compound, rapidly frozen, then sectioned at 5µm thickness in a cryostat at -200c.  The sections were stained with FITC conjugated rabbit anti-sera against human IgG, IgM, IgA, C3 and fibrinogen. The sections were then viewed under fluorescence microscope.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1. A grid superimposed on a glomerulus in the biopsy of a patient with mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis using Adobe illustrator 8.0. Total 48 points superimposed on glomerular area within Bowman’s capsule, 9 points superimposed on PAS positive area. The resulting PAS positive area was 18.8%.

Morphometry

Histomorphometry was performed by means of an image analysis system in a computer using Adobe Illustrator 8.0. Glomerular deposition of PAS positive material (% of total glomerular area) was measured quantitatively by morphometric examination of three to five glomeruli in PAS stained sections. Tangentially cut glomeruli were excluded. A section in which the apparent diameter was <50% of maximum diameter was defined as tangential section. The quantitative examination included the areas of glomerular deposition of PAS positive material of the total glomerular area. This was performed by means of a point counting method, which has been described as an accepted standard for histomorphometric evaluation. Colour microphotographs were taken by means of an Olympus digital camera (DP 11, Japan) which was attached to an Olympus microscope (BX51TF, Japan). The original magnification was 200 X. The colour microscopic images were transferred to a computer and saved in the memory. A grid was prepared in the computer using Adobe Illustrator 8.0. The space between the intersecting points of the grid was 6.25 mm. The total number of points of the grid was 169, and total area was 5625 sq.mm. The images of a glomerului were reduced to 20% of its original size and the grid projected over it (Fig. 1). The total glomerular areas were determined by counting the numbers of intersecting points superimposed on glomerular areas within Bowman’s capsule. The percentage of PAS positive material was represented by numbers of points falling on PAS positive material as percentage of total points falling on total structure within Bowman’s capsule. To minimize the error each glomerulus was measured three times by changing the position of grid. The mean of these values for each glomerulus was calculated and scored from 1- 4 according to degree of PAS positive areas (Table I).

 

Table I:  Scoring system of glomerular PAS positive material

Glomerular PAS positive area. Score
Up to 10% of the glomerular PAS positive area 1
>10-25% of the glomerular PAS positive area 2
>25-50% of the glomerular PAS positive area 3
>50% of the glomerular PAS positive area 4

 

Statistics

The correlations of glomerular PAS staining areas with renal function were determined with Pearson’s correlation method. Results were statistically significant if p <0.05.

 Results

Of the total 112 cases, 55 (49.1%) were mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis (Mes PGN), 45 (40.2%) were mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis (MCGN), 8 (7.1%) were IgA nephropathy (IgAN), 3 (2.7%) were membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) and 1 (0.9%) was chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN). The glomerular PAS positive material ranged from 8.46% to 56.73% with a mean value of 20.71 ± 7.9%. The mean values of glomerular PAS positive areas in MesPGN, MCGN, IgA nephropathy, MGN and CGN were 19.46 ± 6.3%, 22.31 ± 8.1%, 15.69 ± 3.9%, 31.05 ± 22.3% and 27.04% respectively. PAS positive areas were scored from 1 to 4 (Table II).

 Table II: Score of glomerular PAS positive areas

 

Score PAS  positive area

(Mean ± SD)

No. of patients

n = 112

        1 9.14 ± 0.77% 4
        2 18.31 ± 4.05% 85
        3 29.38 ± 5.25% 21
        4 54.88 ± 2.61% 2

 Out of 112 cases estimation of blood urea was done in 107 cases, creatinine clearance ratevin 100 cases and serum creatinine in all of the cases. It was observed that with the increase of glomerular PAS positive score the levels of blood urea and serum creatinine also increased whereas the levels of Ccr decreased (Fig. 2). Glomerular PAS positive areas showed significantly strong positive correlation with the levels of blood urea and serum creatinine (r = 0.566, p <0.001 and r = 0.763, p <0.001, respectively), whereas with Ccr the relationship was significantly inverse (r = – 0.612, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3-5).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 2. Result of renal function tests according to score of PAS positive areas

Figure 3. Correlation between glomerular PAS positive area and blood urea

 

 

 

 

Figure 4. Correlation between glomerular PAS positive area and serum creatinine

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 5. Correlation between glomerular PAS positive area and creatinine clearance rate

 Discussion

In many of the glomerulonephritis there is deposition of PAS positive extracellular matrix in GBM and mesangium and glomerular PAS positive areas correlate with renal function expressed as blood urea, serum creatinine and creatinine clearance.

With this aim Suzuki in 1994 performed a quantitative study on diabetic nephropathy. He stained glomerular mesangial deposition of various glycoproteins with PAS and measured the positive areas by an automatic image analyzer. He correlated the percentages of glomerular PAS positive areas with serum creatinine and found significant correlation.4

 

In 1997, Vleming and co-authors performed a quantitative study on various forms of glomerular diseases to find out the correlation of glomerular PAS positive areas with renal function. They found that the percentages of glomerular PAS positive areas correlated strongly with renal insufficiency expressed as serum creatinine.2

In view of the same aim Danilewicz and Wagrowska Danilewicz in 1997 carried out a quantitative study on three forms of proliferative glomerulonephritis MesPGN, MCGN and IgA nephropathy. They failed to demonstrate any significant correlation between glomerular PAS positive matrix deposition and serum creatinine. These investigators found that correlation between these parameters tended to be positive but have not reached statistical significance. They could not agree with the earlier findings of Vleming et al 1997 and stated that in their study patients biopsies contained a mixed bag of diagnosis. Therefore, this would require external validation of their findings in a cohort of patient with one disease.13

Vleming and co-authors in 1998 performed another quantitative study with a single disease entity for confirmation of their previous findings of significant positive correlation of glomerular PAS positive material with renal function. IgA nephropathy was selected and obtained significant correlation between glomerular PAS positive areas and creatinine clearance rate at the time of biopsy.14

The present study was performed to measure glomerular PAS positive material quantitatively and to determine whether this parameter correlates with renal function. It was observed that with the increase of PAS positive scores the level of blood urea and serum creatinine also proportionately increased whereas the level of creatinine clearance rate decreased. The glomerular PAS positive areas correlated strongly with the levels of blood urea, serum creatinine and Ccr. Our results correspond to the observation of Vleming et al. 1997, Vleming et al. 1998 and Suzuki 1994. The findings of present study only differ with the study of Danilewicz et al. 1997. They did not find significant correlation between PAS positive areas and serum creatinine in MesPGN, MCGN and IgAN. Total number of cases in their study was small and they have included only less severe cases of glomerulonephritis. This may be the possible cause of insignificant correlation in their study.

Conclusion

It was concluded that the severity of glomerular PAS positive matrix accumulation in glomerulonephritis correlated with the severity of renal insufficiency and our study confirmed the results previously obtained by different observers concerning significant correlation between these parameters.

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge Bangladesh Medical Research Council (BMRC) for their support by a research grant for this study under WHO Research Programme.

 References

  1. Cotran RS, Kumar V, Collins T. (Eds). Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease, 6th Philadephia: WB Saunders, 1999: 931-64.
  2. Vleming LJ, Baelde JJ, Westendorp RGJ, Daha MR, Es van LA, Bruijn JA and Bruijn JA. The Glomerular deposition of PAS positive material correlates with renal function in human kidney diseases. Clin Nephrol, 1997; 47: 158-167.
  3. Glick AD, Jacobson HR, Haralson MA. Mesangial deposition of type 1 collagen in human glomerulosclerosis. Hum pathol, 1992; 23: 1373-7.
  4. Suzuki D. Measurement of the extracellular matrix in glomeruli from patients with diabetic nephropathy using an automatic image analyzer. Japanese Journal of Nephrology, 1994; 36 (11): 1209-1215.
  5. Risdon RA, Sloper JC, De Wardener HE. Relationship between renal function and histological changes found in renal-biopsy specimens from patients with persistent glomerulonephritis. Lancet, 1968; 2: 363-366.
  6. Schainuch LI, Striker GE, Cuter RE, Bendin EP. Structural-functional correlations in renal diseases. II. The correlations. Hum Pathol, 1970; 1:630-641.
  7. Bohle A, Mackensen-Heam S, von Gise H. Significance of tubulointerstitial changes in the renal cortex for the excretory function and concentration ability of the kidney. A morphometric comparison. Am J Nephrol, 1987; 7: 42-433.
  8. Mackensen-Heam S, Bohle A, Christensen J, Wehrmann M, Kendjiora H, Kokot F. The consequences for renal function of widening of the interstitium and changes in the tubular epithelium of the renal cortex and outer medulla in various renal diseases. Clin Nephrol, 1992; 37:70-77.
  9. Lane PH, Steffes MW, Fioretto P, Mauer M. Renal interstitial expansion in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Kidney International, 1993; 43: 661-667.
  10. Steffes MW, Bilous RW, Sutherland DER, Mauer SM. Cells and matrix components of the glomerular mesangium in type I diabetes. Diabetes, 1992; 41:679-84.
  11. Mauer SM, Steffes MW, Ellis EN, Sutherland DE, Brown DM, Goetz FC. Structural-functional relationships in diabetic nephropathy. J Clin Invest, 1984; 74:1143-1155.
  12. Thomsen OF, Andersen AR, Christiansenis A and Deckert T. Renal changes in long-term type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with and without clinical nephropathy: a light microscopic, morphometric study of autopsy material. Diabetilogica, 1984; 26: 361-365.
  13. Danilewicz M and Wagrowska- Danilewicz M. The consequences for renal function of the glomerular deposition of PAS positive material in proliferative glomerulopathies. A quantitative study. Gen Diag Pathol, 1997; 143: 225-230.
  14. Vleming LJ, Fijter DE JW, Westendorp RGJ, Daha MR, Bruijn JA and Es van LA,. Histomorphometric correlates of renal failure in IgA nephropathy. Clin Nephrol,1998;49:337-344.

 

Implementing Synoptic Reporting System in Bangladesh

Journal of Histopathology and Cytopathology
Volume 2 N 1
January 2018

Editorial

Implementing Synoptic Reporting System in Bangladesh

*Talukder SI

Histopathology report is a medical document written by histopathologist. In all types of biopsy sample of tumours such as excisional, incisional, punch, curettage and needle biopsies, traditional histopathology reports of formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue sections is followed by microscopic examination of haematoxylin and eosin stained slides is a gold standard for tumour diagnosis. Histopathologists have to write name of the organ from which the biopsy has been taken, gross description of the specimen, microscopic description of the lesion mentioning invasion, margin involvement, lymph node metastasis, grades, and diagnosis.  It may also also contain an optional comment section that is used when diagnosis is inclusive or development of cancer is unclear. Histopathologist can mention inadequacy of sample and can recommend for other tests. With the exception of a few most of the practicing histopathologists in Bangladesh usually give histopathology reports in descriptive format. Most of the oncologists in this country manage cancer patients with these traditional descriptive histopathology reports.

Many developed countries are using synoptic (structured) histopathology reports along with traditional reports in the management of cancer patients.1 Synoptic report is applicable when entire or a part of an organ with malignant tumour is removed. This report lists the most important results in a structured format. It is a clinical documentation method that uses structured checklist to help clinicians to produce more complete, consistent and valuable medical reports.2 Synoptic reports are faster to produce and easier to interpret. It includes items or fields considered most important in determining patients’ treatment options and chance of recurrence. It is a clinical template that ensures that pathologists are always prompt to report on data that is critical for clinical decision making.

Some developed countries developed electronic synoptic report writing software to digitize their process, reducing reporting time and simplifying report distribution. Histopathologists can produce consistently complete reports, using configurable template under pinhead by interoperable code such as ICD-10. Because of their consistency and the ease of their distribution, electronic synoptic reports can be compiled and searched for quality assurance and clinical research.

In Bangladesh, those who use synaptic report is usually based on customized version of the college of American Pathologists (CAP) protocol. These reports therefore vary among themselves. Bangladesh Academy of Pathology (BAP) has already taken initiative to implement synoptic reporting in histopathology reporting of cancer patient when entire tissue is removed. BAP has recently arranged a workshop on synaptic report writing among the member of this organization. They decided that these types of workshops will be continued with participants including histopathologists and clinicians.

Adoption of standardized histopathology reporting formats that suits the best in the context of Bangladesh is the first step forward. We hope, synoptic reporting will be implemented soon in Bangladesh.

 *Dr. Sadequel Islam Talukder, Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Shaheed Syed Nazrul Islam Medical College, Kishoreganj. Associate Editor, Journal of Histopathology and Cytopathology. sadequel@yahoo.com

References

  1. College of American Pathologists. Resources & Publications: Cancer Protocols www.cap.org/cancerprotocols.
  2. Simplifying cancer reporting with eForm. http://www.cap.org/web/home/lab/proficiency-testing/cap-eFRM?_afrLoop=987349351061638#!%40%40%3F_afrLoop%3D987349351061638%26_adf.ctrl-state%3Djimk1r9yv_30

 

 

Information for Contributors

Journal of Histopathology and Cytopathology

Information for Contributors

 General Information
The Journal of Histopathology and Cytopathology (JHC) aims in our understanding of the pathophysiological and pathogenetic mechanisms of human disease by publishing  original papers, review articles, case reports and short communications related to basic and translational fields in pathology. It serves as  bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but is not restricted to, tissue based studies only. It is published twice a year as the Journal Committee of the Bangladesh Academy of Pathology.

Manuscript Preparation.

Manuscripts should be prepared in MS Word format in accordance with The Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals

(see http://www.icmje.org). All pages of the manuscript should be double-spaced and numbered consecutively beginning with the Title page.  Each of the following sections should begin on separate pages: Title,  Name and affiliation of authors, Abstract and Keywords, Text, Acknowledgements, References, individual Tables and legends.  Reformatting of the accepted papers may be needed according to the Journal specifications.

Title Page

The title page should include (i) type of publication (original, review, case report etc.) (ii) the complete title of the article (iii) authors’ name in abbreviation  (iv) list of authors including full name, highest degree, signature, designation and institutional affiliation and (v) name, mailing address, email and telephone/mobile number of author responsible for correspondence.

Abstracts

It should begin with full title of the article. Do not write authors name in the abstract page. The abstracts should not be more than 200 words. The abstract should state the purpose of the study or investigations, basic procedures, main findings and principal conclusion. Three to ten keywords may be provided below the abstract using terms from the Medical Subject Headings (Index Medicus, NLM, USA). Abbreviations and citations should be avoided.

 Text

The text of the original articles should be divided into following sections: Introduction,

Methods, Result and Discussion.

 References

References to literature should be numbered in Arabic numerical in superscripts consecutively in the order in which they are mentioned in the text. At the end of article the full list of references should give the name of all authors followed by the title of the article, the title of the journal abbreviated according to Index Medicus, the year of publication, volume number and first and last pages of the article. Title of the books should be followed by the edition, place of publication, the publisher, the year and the relevant pages. Examples of correct form of reference are given below: References should begin on a new page, be double-spaced and numbered in order of citation in the text, including citations in tables and figure legends. Citations that first appear in tables, figures, or supplemental data should be numbered according to the item’s first call out in the text; a separate reference list should not be prepared for supplemental data. Complete author citation is required (use of “et al” is only acceptable for sources with more than 35 authors).

References should conform to the style of the Journal.

Examples follow:

Journals: van Riel D, Leijten LM, Kochs G, Osterhaus AD, Kuiken T: Decrease of Virus Receptors during Highly Pathogenic H5N1 Virus Infection in Humans and Other Mammals. Am J Pathol 2013, 183:1382-1389

Electronic Journals: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009, 6:e1000097. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Books: Frosch MP: Central Nervous System. Robbins Basic Pathology, 9th Edition. Edited by Kumar V, Abbas AK, Aster JC. Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 2012, pp. 811-850

Product Inserts: Cite in text only: (Affymetrix technical note: Globin Reduction Protocol: A Method for Processing Whole Blood RNA Samples for Improved Array Results. Santa Clara, CA).

Web sites: Cite in text only. See Data Supplements and Non-Traditional Media section below for proper use of web site references. Use the doi when available. Include the name of the institution sponsoring the web site, URL address with direct linkage to the referenced information, and date of last access.

Tables

Tables should be typed written on separate numbered pages submitted after the main text on separate pages, as part of the manuscript. The preferred file format for Tables is MS Word. and should follow the reference list. All tables should be numbered consecutively using Roman numerical. Each must carry a brief descriptive heading. Tables should be planned to fit within print area. Table footnotes should use the sequential symbols: *, †, ‡, §, ¶, ∥; and abbreviations.

Illustrations

Figure file formats (including those embedded in the text) are unacceptable.

Photographs and photomicrographs should be of high resolution (minimum 5 mega pixels), in original unedited form and jpg format. These should contain a legend with magnification and stain used. Figure number and name of the first author should be mentioned in each file. Legend should be given in separate page.  Patients’ identification should be hidden.

Abbreviation

Standard abbreviation should be used whenever possible. The full term for which the abbreviation stands followed by abbreviation in parenthesis should be proceed the first use of the abbreviation in the text except for standard units of measurements like 27OC and 25 mmol/L etc.

Letters to the editor

Communications with reference to an article published in the journal and current health problems in the community will be accepted as letter to the editor.

 Electronic Copy

An electronic copy (soft copy) in the form of CD must be submitted with the printed copy of the article. Electronic copy may be send by email attachment at sadequel@yahoo.com.

Text should be processed with MS Word and pictures should be saved in JPG format.

Manuscript Submission

Electronic version of the manuscripts should be submitted through email to the Executive Editor.  Alternatively send DVD/CD to: The Executive Editor of the Journal of Histopathology and Cytopathology.  A cover letter to the editor must accompany the manuscript stating any,  (a) conflicts of interest (both financial and personal), (b) that the manuscript has not been published previously and is not being considered concurrently by another publication, and (c) all authors and acknowledged contributors have read and approved the manuscript. Submissions are not considered for review if previously published in any form (print or online) other than as an abstract. The editor reserves the customary right to style and if necessary shorten the material accepted for publication and to determine the priority and time of publication. Editor assumes that work based on honest observations. It is not the task of the editor to investigate scientific fraud paper.

Proofs

The corresponding author will be contacted by email once proofs are ready, and will be directed to download electronic proofs from a secure website. The author should check the proofs carefully, mark any printer’s errors, and answer queries as requested. Author changes should be kept to a minimum. Proof corrections and replacement figures (if any) must be returned within 48 hours to avoid any delay in publication.

The Review Strategy

On receipt, manuscripts are assessed by the Editor-in-Chief, to one Associate Editor. The Reviewers’ and Associate Editor’s views are used by the Editor-in-Chief (or a Senior Editor) in reaching a decision, usually within three weeks of submission.

 Summary of Submission, General pointsL

Format the word processing document as double spaced A4 pages with an additional space between paragraphs and margins of at least 2 cm all round. Use a 12-pt standard font such as Times, Helvetica or Arial (with Symbol for special characters). Do not use line numbering, but include page numbers in the header or footer, aligned right. Use consistent, preferably UK English spelling.

 Manuscript title

This should be clear, simple and concise; long titles lack impact. Please remember that many readers will only scan titles, so they should reflect the message of the paper and catch the readers’ attention.

A short running title

This must be 75 characters or less, including spaces, and reflect the main title and content of the manuscript.

 List of authors

Authorship credit should be based only on 1) substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; 2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; 3) final approval of the version to be published.

 A statement outlining the specific contribution of each author to the manuscript and the work reported in it must appear after the acknowledgements section (see below).

 Full affiliations of all authors: Include the name of the department(s) and institution(s) to which the work should be attributed. Append the corresponding author(s) full postal address, phone number and email address.

 

Conflict of interest statements

Authors must disclose all financial and personal relationships that might bias their work; to prevent ambiguity, a conflict of interest statement must appear on the manuscript title page, detailing any conflicts (or the absence thereof) for each author.

 

Word count (from beginning of Introduction to end of Discussion)

Concise articles make a greater impact than long ones and are less likely to be delayed by editing to a suitable length. Full articles should be no more than 4000 words from the beginning of the Introduction to the end of the Discussion. Review articles and special features may occasionally exceed this limit by arrangement with the Editor-in-Chief.

 

Abstract (not structured and no more than 300 words)

Following the title page(s), the next page should carry an unstructured prose abstract of 300 words or less. It should clearly convey the purposes of the study, and the main procedures, findings and conclusions. It should be understandable without reference to the rest of the paper, and contain no citation to references in the reference list. Only standard abbreviations as listed below are permitted.

 

Keywords (3 to 10)

Below the abstract, authors should provide and identify as such 3 to 10 keywords or short phrases to assist indexing the article and that may be published with the abstract. MESH headings are a useful guide for authors in considering keywords.

 

Manuscript structure

Research articles are divided into sections with the headings: Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion. Long articles may need subheadings (especially within the Results and Discussion) to clarify their content. The sections should not be numbered. Other types of articles, such as reviews and commentaries, still need a title and abstract and should adhere as closely as possible to these guidelines.