jhc2025v9i1s2

Original Article

Association of E-cadherin Expression with Histopathological Grades and Clinical Stages of Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

*Tayeb M,1Mimi SA,2 Kamal MS,3 Snigdha SS4

  1. *Dr. Mohammad Tayeb, MD (Pathology), Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Jahurul Islam Medical College. tmohammad75@yahoo.com
  2. Professor Dr. Shamim Akhter Mimi, M. Phil (Pathology), Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College.
  3. Mohammad Shah Kamal, FCPS (ENT), Associate Professor, Department of Otorhinology & Head-Neck Surgery, Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College.
  4. Shyla Sharmin Snigdha, MD (Pathology),Assistant professor, Department of Pathology, Zainul Haque Sikder Women’s Medical College.

*For correspondence

Abstract
Background: E-cadherin gene plays an important role in the carcinogenesis of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). This study aimed to evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of E-cadherin in different grades and clinical stages of LSCC and to determine the association of E-cadherin with clinical stages and histopathological grades.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology, Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College, from March 2021 to January 2023. Immunohistochemistry was performed in 50 histopathologically diagnosed cases of LSCC using a commercially available anti-E-cadherin antibody. The total score of immunoreaction was calculated by multiplying the expression score and intensity score.
Results: The mean age of the LSCC patients was 62.8 years, and 66% were male. Grade I is the most frequent histopathological grade (48%), followed by grade II (42%) and grade III (10%). The most frequent clinical T stage was T3 (56%), and the N stage was N2 (58.06%). E-cadherin expression was positive in 72% of cases; the rest, 28%, showed reduced expression. A significant association was found between E-cadherin expression with histopathological grades (p=0.007) and clinical N stage (p=0.009) but not significant with clinical T stage (p=0.502), anatomic site (P=0.132), and the habit of smoking (0.276).

Conclusion: LSCC patients with reduced E-cadherin expression are at the risk of high-grade carcinoma and nodal metastasis. So, the expression of E-cadherin in pre-treatment biopsy samples can be utilized as one of the prognostic factors and advocated to anti-E-cadherin targeted therapy in LSCC.

[Journal of Histopathology and Cytopathology, 2025 Jan; 9 (1):3-9]

Keywords: E-cadherin, Expression, Immunohistochemistry, laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.69950/jhc2025v9i1s2

jhc2025v9i1s1

 

DOI: https://www.doi.org/10.69950/jhc2025v9i1s1

Editorial

Red Meat: A Potential Carcinogen to Human

*Rahman DA

*Dr. DM Arifur Rahman, Associate Professor (Histopathology), TMSS Medical College, Bogura. Bangladesh. arifurrahmandm@gmail.com

 

Meat is one of the important sources of high quality protein, having appealing taste and flavor. The annual per capita meat consumption has steadily increased from 32.10 kg/year in 1961 to 62.57 kg/year in 2019. This trend is particularly noteworthy in developing countries.1 Usually, the meat is classified into red meat and white meat. Although there is no universally accepted definition, the red meat is defined as mammalian muscle meat, including beef, goat, lamb, and pork, while white meat refers to non-mammalian sources such as poultry, seafood and fish.2Red meat contains more total iron and haem iron than white meat. Beef, lamb, goat and horse meat are richer in haem iron and total iron than pork meat. The age of the animal is also important in iron intake, as older animals contain more iron. Red meat contains high biological value proteins and essential micronutrients, including vitamins and minerals.3

 

Recent evidence suggesting that higher red meat consumption (RMC) is injurious to human health. Several epidemiological and pathological studies have reported a positive association between RMC and the incidence of cancer particularly breast, prostate, pancreatic and colorectal cancer.2,4,5 No positive association has been found between the consumption of white meat and cancer incidence.6 Meat processing, such as curing and smoking, can result in formation of carcinogenic chemicals, including N-nitroso-compounds (NOC) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). Cooking improves the digestibility and palatability of meat, but can

also produce known or suspected carcinogens, including heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAA) and PAH. High-temperature cooking by panfrying, grilling, or barbecuing generally produces the highest amounts of these chemicals.7,8

 

Data on the association of red meat consumption with colorectal cancer were available from 14 cohort studies. Positive associations were seen with high versus low consumption of red meat in half of those studies.9 Haem iron mediates formation of N-nitroso-compounds (NOC), and of lipid oxidation products in the digestive tract of human beings and rodents. Meat heated at a high temperature contains heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAA). HAA is genotoxic. Meat smoked or cooked over a heated surface or open flame contains polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). These chemicals cause DNA damage, but little direct evidence exists that this occurs following meat consumption.9   Although there is some controversy over the direct association between red meat consumption and cancer risk, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified red meat as a Group 2A carcinogen (probably carcinogenic to humans) in 2015.10

References

  1. Godfray HCJ, Aveyard P, Garnett T, Hall JW, Key TJ, Lorimer J, Pierrehumbert RT, Scarborough P, Springmann M, Jebb SA. Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science. 2018 Jul 20; 361(6399):eaam5324. doi: 10.1126/science.aam5324. PMID: 30026199.
  2. Ma H, Qi X. Red Meat Consumption and Cancer Risk: A Systematic Analysis of Global Data. Foods. 2023 Nov 17;12(22):4164. doi: 10.3390/foods12224164. PMID: 38002221; PMCID: PMC10670314.
  3. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Red Meat and Processed Meat. Lyon (FR): International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2018. (IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, No. 114.) 1. EXPOSURE DATA. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507973/
  4. Lo JJ, Park YM, Sinha R, Sandler DP. Association between meat consumption and risk of breast cancer: Findings from the Sister Study. Int J Cancer. 2020 Apr 15; 146(8):2156-2165. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32547. Epub 2019 Aug 6. PMID: 31389007; PMCID: PMC7002279.

Bradbury KE, Murphy N, Key TJ. Diet and colorectal cancer in UK Biobank: a prospective study. Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 1; 49(1):246-258. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz064. PMID: 30993317; PMCID: PMC7124508.

  1. Bouvard V, Loomis D, Guyton KZ, Grosse Y, Ghissassi FE, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Guha N, Mattock H, Straif K; International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec; 16(16):1599-600. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00444-1. Epub 2015 Oct 29. PMID: 26514947.
  2. Alaejos MS, Afonso AM. Factors that affect the content of heterocyclic aromatic amines in foods. Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety. 2011 Mar; 10(2):52-108.
  3. Alomirah H, Al-Zenki S, Al-Hooti S, Zaghloul S, Sawaya W, Ahmed N, Kannan K. Concentrations and dietary exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from grilled and smoked foods. Food control. 2011 Dec 1;22(12):2028-35.
  4. Bouvard V, Loomis D, Guyton KZ, Grosse Y, El Ghissassi F, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Guha N, Mattock H, Straif K. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat. The Lancet Oncology. 2015 Dec 1;16(16):1599-600.
  5. Vieira AR, Abar L, Chan DSM, Vingeliene S, Polemiti E, Stevens C, Greenwood D, Norat T. Foods and beverages and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies, an update of the evidence of the WCRF-AICR Continuous Update Project. Ann Oncol. 2017 Aug 1; 28(8):1788-1802. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx171. PMID: 28407090.

 

 

 

 

jhc2025v9i1

 

Front Cover PDF
Index PDF
Inside Back Cover PDF
Editorial Board PDF


Contents

Editorial

1. Red Meat: A Potential Carcinogen to Human
Rahman DA

Original Contributions

2. Association of E-cadherin Expression with Histopathological Grades and Clinical Stages of Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Tayeb M, Mimi SA, Kamal MS, Snigdha SS

3. Expression of Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor in Malignant Epithelial Ovarian Tumors
Shams S, Das R, Saha S

4. Expression of P53 in Clinically Diagnosed Solitary Thyroid Nodules
Ripa SP, Shilpi HK, Begum S

5. Determination of Mast Cell Density in Urothelial Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder and its Relation with Grading and Invasiveness
Wahid SR, Asafudullah SM, Khatun MM, Momin NN, Shirin S

 6. Expression of Ki-67 and AgNOR in Primary Central Nervous System (CNS) Tumours
Nahar A, Islam MN,Kabir E

7. Computed Tomography Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Mass Lesions of Lung: A Study of 56 Cases
Wahed A, Islam N, Hossain MM, Nurunnabi M

8. Histopathological Study of Clinically Suspected Marjolin Ulcer at a Specialized Major Burn Centre in Bangladesh
Asaduzzaman,Datta T, Khandkar T, Chowdhury MA

Other

9. Information for Contributors